Gerald Gaus: The Order of Public Reason— A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World
نویسندگان
چکیده
Gerald Gaus’ book The Order of Public Reason is one of the most interesting manifestations of a recent trend in moral and political philosophy. Following Rawls it blends Kantian and non-Kantian approaches supplying at least some prominent schools of moral and political philosophy with a much needed patch of overlapping consensus. In particular, Humean and Kantian considerations are merged in a theory of rights-constrained social evolution. Gaus’ work stands out among others for asking the right questions and for providing good answers. He claims to outline a viable social ethic, i.e., a dutyand right-based ethic for the interaction between persons. Such an ethic tells us “what we owe to each other”, in Thomas Scanlon’s influential phraseology. However, the pervasiveness of reasonable disagreement concerning most issues of justice and duty even between good-willed moral evaluators is taken much more seriously by Gaus than by Scanlon and most other philosophers. This is a step in the right direction, because it underlines that a social ethic ought to be mainly concerned with secondorder considerations, considerations of what we owe to others who do not agree with our moral beliefs. Moreover, Gaus offers a further boon to the readers of this journal. He amply employs concepts of rational choice and game-theory thus documenting that they can be valuable instruments of philosophical analysis even beyond the narrower confines of neo-Hobbesian social contract theories.
منابع مشابه
The Scope of Instrumental Morality
In The Order of Public Reason (2011a), Gerald Gaus rejects the instrumental approach to morality as a viable account of social morality. Gaus’ rejection of the instrumental approach to morality, and his own moral theory, raise important foundational questions concerning the adequate scope of instrumental morality. In this article, I address some of these questions and I argue that Gaus’ rejecti...
متن کاملThe Place of Autonomy Within Liberalism
1 Introduction My concern in this chapter is the place of autonomy within liberalism, understood as a public morality.
متن کاملHegel’s Ethics
My purpose in this article is not to offer any original insights into Hegel’s ethics, but merely to provide a brief overview that draws upon the most reliable secondary sources. In order to help organize the material, I compare Hegel’s views with the communitarian critique of liberalism. Following this, there is a brief account of the relation between Hegel’s ethical and religious thought. Hege...
متن کاملStatement of the Negative Theory of Ethics in Sadra’s Wisdom
By analyzing the issue of annihilation as the end of moral action, this article pays attention to a new interpretation of Sadra’s mystical moral system. In order to reach his ultimate happiness, man must destroy the degrees of his existence: absence of form, absence of self, and absence of spirit. These steps, which are equivalent to natural death, destruction of the human self and annihilation...
متن کاملThe Status of Spontaneous Order in von Hayek’s Theory of Freedom and Its Educational Implications
The Status of Spontaneous Order in von Hayek’s Theory of Freedom and Its Educational Implications M. Moosivand Y. Ghaa’edi, Ph.D. S. Zarghaami, Ph.D. A. R. Mahmoodniyaa, Ph.D. The history of human thought shows that the concept of freedom and its use in different frameworks has been a major topic of discussion in philosophy. Within the educational system, freedom ...
متن کامل